Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning enabled unique chip feature extraction approach for semicustom delay variant PUF.

B Muthu Nisha, J Selvakumar, Soumyaranjan Routray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B Muthu NishaDepartment of ECE, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 603203, India.
J SelvakumarDepartment of ECE, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 603203, India. selvakuj@srmist.edu.in.
Soumyaranjan RoutrayDepartment of ECE, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 603203, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article presents a chip feature extraction approach to create unique and unclonable hardware fingerprints to increase reliability in a hardware security system. A static D flip-flop-based delay counter is used as a delay unit to propose a lightweight PUF in place of the Configurable Ring Oscillators (CROs) in the existing PUF. Initially, the design is simulated and synthesized using three different Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) technologies to study process variations. Its reliability is ensured through Multi-Mode Multi-Corner (MMMC) analysis. The circuit stands out with its + 0.004 ps slack timing and operates stably within a temperature range of 0 °C to 125 °C. It is quite interesting to observe that it works efficiently within a voltage range of 1.62 V to 1.98 V. Overall, 155 unique data paths are resolved and carried out by Static Timing Analysis (STA), which ensures the uniqueness of the core design. Furthermore, the results of Machine Learning techniques and the NIST statistical test suite confirm the proposed structure's randomness strength. A comparison of this work with recent findings indicates the specific advantages of the implemented method. The study classifies the proposed Semicustom Delay Variant PUF (SDV PUF) as either strong or weak by adhering to the security requirements.

Indexed as

Hardware securityMMMCStatic D-flip flopStatic timing analysisUnique fingerprint

Identifiers

PMID42049868
PMCPMC13314961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.