ArticleScientific reports2026
Genetic alterations in poor-quality individually selected sperm highlight candidate biomarkers for male subfertility.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of morphology-selected sperm pools provides an exploratory approach for investigating genomic features associated with variable sperm quality. In this study, pooled DNA from 1500 individually selected spermatozoa per sample was analyzed from paired high-quality (HQ; motile, normal morphology) and poor-quality (PQ; immotile, abnormal morphology) sperm populations obtained from the same ejaculate of six male partners undergoing infertility treatment. A multi-step filtering and annotation pipeline incorporating American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria, population allele frequencies, tissue-specific expression, and predicted protein effects identified 42 unique high-confidence variants affecting 32 genes across all samples, all consistent with homozygous genotypes in the corresponding individuals as inferred from pooled sperm DNA. Across descriptive comparisons, PQ sperm pools frequently showed numerically higher counts across several variant categories, including structural alterations, splice-related annotations, and coding variant annotations, although none of these differences reached statistical significance. Because HQ and PQ pools were derived from the same individuals, these observations were interpreted descriptively rather than as evidence of distinct inherited variant burden between sperm quality groups. A frameshift insertion in FOXO6, detected in a single PQ sample, represented the most notable exploratory candidate variant, while recurrent variants such as NPIPB15 p.Tyr301Cys and ANKRD36C p.Gly311Asp were observed across multiple samples. When considered together with semen characteristics and pregnancy outcomes, the data support the possibility that poor-quality sperm may be associated with altered genomic integrity, particularly at the level of structural instability, while also highlighting recurrent candidate variants for further study. These findings support the value of broad genomic profiling of morphology-selected sperm pools as an exploratory strategy for investigating male subfertility and identifying candidate variants for future validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.