ArticleScientific reports2026
Live-cell STED microscopy enables 50 nm resolution imaging with preserved cell proliferation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy is a super-resolution imaging technique that uses a high light dose to surpass the diffraction limit. The excellent spatiotemporal resolution achieved by STED, combined with its nontoxic labeling, facilitates super-resolution imaging in living cells. However, the use of high-intensity lasers, along with repeated fluorophore excitation-depletion cycles, may cause phototoxic effects. In this study, we examined the invasiveness of live-cell STED microscopy to validate its use. Investigating cell proliferation is among the best strategies for detecting and quantifying potential phototoxic effects. Therefore, we studied long-term (20 h) cell proliferation and survival after high-resolution (50 nm) STED imaging using a 775 nm depletion beam. We observed no significant differences in proliferation and mortality rates between STED- and non-STED-imaged control cells for various human cell lines (U2OS, HeLa, and RPE-1), with STED imaging performed on different cellular structures (nuclear pore complex, Golgi, actin, and mitochondria). Importantly, the STED-imaged cells showed no significant mitotic delay compared to the control when timing the onset of mitosis. In addition to long-term effects, we measured short-term stress response by observing cytosolic calcium levels after high-resolution STED imaging and during low-resolution STED scanning, and found no significant stress. These results show the applicability of STED microscopy for noninvasive super-resolution imaging in living cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.