ArticleScientific reports2026
A hypothesis-driven responsible AI framework for interpretable ESG forecasting with RuleFit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The systematic integration of artificial intelligence (AI) within business practices and corporate governance has made Responsible AI (RAI) an absolute subset of corporate social responsibility. This research formulates a framework that integrates Responsible AI principles with hypothesis-driven rule extraction to predict Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores. Employing the ensemble-based RuleFit algorithm, we construct decision rules that algorithmically associate non-linearly with firm-level attributes such as size, leverage, digitization intensity, and managerial ownership. These rules are then transformed into domain-specific hypotheses and subsequently subjected to statistical validation using nonparametric tests to ensure robust results under non-normal outcome distributions. Performance predictive models are augmented to preserve equity by simultaneously assessing subgroup fairness through the distribution of residuals and biased proportions of firm characteristics. In summary, the proposed methodology illustrates how rule-based learning can yield interpretable, statistically sound, and ethically aligned forecasts of ESG outcomes, thereby facilitating reliable decision-making in sustainable finance and corporate governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.