ArticleScientific reports2026
Proteomic taxonomic identification can identify cryptic diversity of Squamata in modern and paleontological specimens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Taxonomic identification of fauna is the foundation for multiple lines of ecological and paleoecological inquiry. However, genomic analyses are increasingly finding morphological similarities can mask species diversity. This cryptic diversity is especially relevant to Squamata (snakes, lizards, and amphisbaenians), members of which tend to be morphologically conserved. ZooMS (zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry) is a proteomic method for taxonomic identification primarily applied to mammals and fish but is largely unexplored in squamates. We expanded the ZooMS reference database to include 23 species of Squamata (Phrynosomatidae and Iguanidae) and reveal proteomic species-level identification is possible for most of our tested species, including within the morphologically indistinguishable Sceloporus undulatus complex. These results open new opportunities for using the fossil record of Squamata for paleoecological investigations, including the reexamination of the long-standing North American herpetofaunal stability hypothesis. We applied this method to the fossil record of Squamata by analyzing 58 fossil lizards from ten paleontological sites in the North American southwest. We found that 37% of the fossils were morphologically misidentified, 58% of misidentifications were to the genus level, and 52% of species-level morphological identifications were incorrect. We additionally found 5% of our modern specimens from natural history collections were misidentified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.