ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing elderly walkability to urban parks using mobility analysis and multi-source data: a case study of central Fuzhou, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ensuring equitable park access amid rapid urbanization and population ageing is essential. We propose an integrated framework that couples street-network impedance modelling with streetscape visual perception to assess elderly walkability to parks in central Fuzhou, China. A multi-source dataset-street networks, street view images, park polygons and demographic data-was compiled. Physical accessibility was calculated via weighted path impedance, whereas perceived accessibility was estimated by semantic segmentation of images and machine-learning calibration against expert scores. Combining the two yields a composite walkability index that exposes areas where dense networks coexist with poor visual environments and vice versa, delineating green corridors and underserved neighbourhoods. By fusing objective and subjective dimensions, the framework identifies priority zones for age-friendly design and scalable park-planning interventions, and indicates where network repairs should be coupled with streetscape upgrades to reduce elderly green-access inequities, especially in underserved neighbourhoods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.