ArticleNature communications2026
Graph augmented transformers improve chemotherapy toxicity symptom extraction from clinical notes.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemotherapy is essential for cancer treatment but may cause adverse events requiring emergency department visits and hospitalizations, placing substantial burdens on patients and healthcare systems. Existing approaches to detect these events often rely on structured electronic health records (EHR) data, which incompletely capture patients' symptom trajectories. Clinical notes contain richer information yet remain challenging to synthesize. Here we show that integrating transformer-based language models with graph neural networks improves extraction of chemotherapy-related toxicity symptoms from clinical notes. We developed Graph-Augmented Transformer for Clinical Notes (GAT-CN), which embeds patient notes using Bio+ClinicalBERT and links them to symptom-related terms within a heterogeneous clinical graph learned using GraphSAGE. In a multi-symptom classification task, GAT-CN outperformed transformer-only models, achieving a weighted AUROC of 0.850 and AUPRC of 0.812. The model also identified additional diagnoses not captured in structured EHRs, confirmed through manual annotation. These results demonstrate that graph-augmented models improve symptom detection from clinical narratives and support earlier monitoring of chemotherapy-related adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.