ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy as a Key Strategy in the Management of Severe Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Septic Frail Patients: A Case Series.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Negative Pressure Wound Therapy as a Key Strategy in the Management of Severe Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Septic Frail Patients: A Case Series.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus represents a major global health challenge, with over 537 million adults currently affected worldwide. Among its complications, diabetic foot ulcers remain a leading cause of morbidity, hospitalization and amputation, imposing a significant socioeconomic burden. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating surgical, medical and rehabilitative expertise. Negative pressure wound therapy has demonstrated clinical efficacy in promoting granulation tissue formation, accelerating wound healing, and reducing infection rates compared with conventional dressings. This case series presents the management of four frail, septic patients with severe diabetic foot ulcers treated between 2023 and 2025 in an academic surgical department. All patients required surgical intervention, including debridement or partial amputation, combined with negative pressure wound therapy and, in selected cases, revascularization or skin grafting. One case utilized an electrospun nanofiber dressing which enhanced wound granulation and shortened healing time. Outcomes varied according to systemic comorbidities, vascular status and glycemic control; however, NPWT consistently supported wound stabilization and preparation for definitive closure. These findings reinforce the essential role of interdisciplinary collaboration and advanced wound technologies in the treatment of complex diabetic foot infections, particularly in frail or septic patients, and highlight the potential of nanofiber-based dressings as adjunctive therapies in comprehensive diabetic foot care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.