Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049509›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026

The Hidden Hazards of Vaping.

Ayaantuu F Usman, Sobia F Khaja

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayaantuu F UsmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-9354
Sobia F KhajaDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-0696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 31 year old male presented with a penetrating oropharyngeal injury following a motor vehicle collision and was found to have a retained metallic foreign body suspected to be part of a vape pen. The foreign body was abutting the carotid artery and was removed via a combined transoral and transcervical approach. This case highlights a novel mechanism of head and neck trauma and emphasizes the importance of understanding a wide spectrum of unique injuries.

Indexed as

Foreign BodiesOropharynxVapingWounds, PenetratingAccidents, TrafficHumansMalemotor vehicle collisionpenetrating oropharyngeal traumavape pen injury

Identifiers

PMID42049509
PMCPMC13569670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.