SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and community health2026
Effects of active travel interventions in the UK on disadvantaged population groups and their potential to reduce health inequalities: systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferential impacts of active travel interventions on disadvantaged population groups have been under-studied. A review of evidence from the UK was commissioned to inform the development of government policy and support the implementation of equitable and effective interventions.
methodsSystematic review, identifying studies via searching 31 electronic databases. Eligible studies evaluated active travel interventions in the UK and reported quantitative data on active travel behaviours and/or linked health outcomes for population subgroups defined by sex/gender, ethnicity, age or socioeconomic status. Two reviewers screened reports, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Outcome data were summarised in relation to directions of intervention effects for population subgroups.
resultsWe included 18 study reports collectively evaluating five interventions. Evidence suggests that interventions are more likely to increase than decrease active travel among females and may also be more likely to benefit females relative to males. Interventions are also more likely to increase than decrease active travel among older adults, but there is no clear evidence that they will benefit this group relative to younger adults. Available evidence gives no clear indication of likely positive or negative impacts on groups defined by ethnicity or socioeconomic status.
conclusionThere is some evidence that active travel interventions improve outcomes and may reduce inequalities in relation to sex, and improve outcomes among older adults. The available evidence for differential impacts of active travel interventions is otherwise largely inconclusive, but importantly provides no clear indication that implementing active travel interventions will widen inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.