Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049478›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and community health2026

Effects of active travel interventions in the UK on disadvantaged population groups and their potential to reduce health inequalities: systematic review.

Gareth J Hollands, Wendy Macdowall, Helen Ed Burchett, Irene Kwan, Preethy D'Souza, Michelle Richardson, Claire Stansfield, David Ogilvie, Jenna Panter, James Thomas and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gareth J HollandsEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK gareth.hollands@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-3924
Wendy MacdowallFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helen Ed BurchettFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8380-2476
Irene KwanEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Preethy D'SouzaEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Michelle RichardsonEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Claire StansfieldEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
David OgilvieMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-4672
Jenna PanterMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
James ThomasEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Amanda J SowdenCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Katy SutcliffeEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential impacts of active travel interventions on disadvantaged population groups have been under-studied. A review of evidence from the UK was commissioned to inform the development of government policy and support the implementation of equitable and effective interventions.

methodsSystematic review, identifying studies via searching 31 electronic databases. Eligible studies evaluated active travel interventions in the UK and reported quantitative data on active travel behaviours and/or linked health outcomes for population subgroups defined by sex/gender, ethnicity, age or socioeconomic status. Two reviewers screened reports, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Outcome data were summarised in relation to directions of intervention effects for population subgroups.

resultsWe included 18 study reports collectively evaluating five interventions. Evidence suggests that interventions are more likely to increase than decrease active travel among females and may also be more likely to benefit females relative to males. Interventions are also more likely to increase than decrease active travel among older adults, but there is no clear evidence that they will benefit this group relative to younger adults. Available evidence gives no clear indication of likely positive or negative impacts on groups defined by ethnicity or socioeconomic status.

conclusionThere is some evidence that active travel interventions improve outcomes and may reduce inequalities in relation to sex, and improve outcomes among older adults. The available evidence for differential impacts of active travel interventions is otherwise largely inconclusive, but importantly provides no clear indication that implementing active travel interventions will widen inequalities.

Indexed as

BicyclingHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesTravelVulnerable PopulationsWalkingFemaleHumansMaleSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthUnited KingdomHealth inequalitiesPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42049478
PMCPMC13479686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.