ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Pathologic Complete Response After Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Node-positive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimEnfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) is the preferred first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinomas. However, the optimal therapy duration and the role of consolidative surgery in patients achieving a complete response remain unclear. CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old Japanese man presented with intermittent gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a locally advanced lower ureteral carcinoma with regional lymph node metastasis (cT4N2M0). First-line systemic EVP therapy was initiated. After six cycles, radiologic assessment demonstrated a partial response of the primary tumor and complete resolution of the lymph node metastases. Subsequently, the patient underwent robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy. Histopathological examination revealed no residual viable carcinoma, confirming a pathologic complete response. No lymph node dissection was performed. Given the lack of pathological confirmation of the nodal response, an additional postoperative cycle of EVP was administered. Systemic therapy was discontinued based on shared decision-making considering concerns regarding cumulative peripheral neuropathy. The patient remained recurrence-free without treatment-related adverse events at 6 months of follow-up.
conclusionThis case demonstrates that EVP can induce a pathologic complete response in patients with node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma, enabling subsequent surgical consolidation and treatment-free surveillance. Although the optimal criteria for treatment discontinuation remain undefined, a treatment-free strategy may be feasible for selected patients who achieve a strong response to EVP. Further studies are warranted to clarify the role of surgery and to establish evidence-based strategies for treatment duration and discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.