ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Usability of a Reminder App that May Help to Reduce Radiotherapy-related Skin Toxicity in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimPatients irradiated for breast cancer may experience acute skin toxicity. To reduce this risk, a mobile application was created which reminds patients to carry out skin care. Before using this app in patients, a pre-study evaluating its usability in healthy volunteers was required. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this prospective study, 30 healthy volunteers from Germany and Denmark were asked to test the app and complete a questionnaire including ten statements ("yes or "no") in three sections.
resultsSatisfaction rates (statements affirmed with "yes") were 66.7% (18/27 participants) and 78.6% (22/28) in the section "download and installation", and 100% (29/29) and 96.7% (29/30) in the section "navigation". In the section "content/functions", the six statements were addressed by 28-30 participants; satisfaction rates were 86.7% to 100% (median 96.5%). Dichotomous responses were supplemented by individual comments.
conclusionThis study revealed that the reminder app needed improvement before tested in patients and demonstrated the importance of a pre-study in healthy volunteers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.