Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049408›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Symptom Burden in Adenomyosis: A Comparative Analysis With Peritoneal and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.

Elvin Piriyev, Clara Mennicken, Sven Schiermeier, Thomas Römer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elvin PiriyevUniversity Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany; piriyev.elvins@gmail.com.
Clara MennickenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Hospital Cologne Weyertal, Cologne, Germany.
Sven SchiermeierUniversity Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Thomas RömerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Hospital Cologne Weyertal, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimAdenomyosis frequently coexists with endometriosis and shares overlapping symptoms; however, the symptom burden of isolated adenomyosis remains insufficiently defined. The aim of this study was to compare the severity and distribution of symptoms in patients with isolated adenomyosis PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed standardized preoperative symptom questionnaires from women who underwent surgery for suspected endometriosis at a tertiary referral center in 2021. Patients were classified intraoperatively using the #ENZIAN system and allocated to three groups: isolated adenomyosis (AM), peritoneal/ovarian endometriosis with or without adenomyosis, and DIE with or without additional disease.

resultsA total of 231 patients were included (isolated AM: n=42; peritoneal/ovarian endometriosis: n=120; DIE: n=69). Dysmenorrhea was highly prevalent across all groups (95-100%). Chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia, including severe dyspareunia, were reported more frequently in patients with isolated AM and peritoneal/ovarian disease than in those with DIE (

conclusionAM is associated with a symptom burden comparable to that of peritoneal and DIE. These findings underscore adenomyosis as a clinically significant cause of pelvic pain and highlight the need for early recognition and appropriate management.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisEndometriosisAdultDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansPelvic PainPeritoneal DiseasesRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSymptom BurdenAdenomyosisadolescentschronic pelvic painendometriosis#ENZIANprimary dysmenorrheaquestionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42049408
PMCPMC13133844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.