Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049387›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2026

HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening during wartime: a pilot implementation study from a conflict-affected region of Ukraine.

Olexiy Kovalyov, Kostyantyn Kovalyov, Olena Deinichenko, Joakim Dillner, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07275333 (Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling for Enhancing Cervical Screening During the War in Ukraine), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07275333 narecruitingnot on this map

Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling for Enhancing Cervical Screening During the War in Ukraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2025 to 2026Enrolled1,000ConditionsCervical Cancer, Cervical Cancer Screening, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection, Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaArmsHPV Self-Sampling Kit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olexiy KovalyovZaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-8191-3132
Kostyantyn KovalyovWorld Against Cancer Charitable Foundation, Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine.ORCID 0009-0009-2232-3429
Olena DeinichenkoZaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine.
Joakim DillnerCenter for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Laila Sara Arroyo MührCenter for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden sara.arroyo.muhr@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2498-5206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer screening is difficult to initiate and sustain during war due to disrupted health services, population displacement and limited clinical capacity. Evidence on whether human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening using self-sampling can function as a screening pathway during armed conflict is unknown. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and operational performance of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in a war-affected region of Ukraine.

methodsWomen aged 30-60 years living in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, Ukraine, were offered HPV testing using self-collected cervicovaginal samples distributed through outpatient clinics, community outreach activities and refugee centres. Samples were analysed locally using PCR-based HPV assays with external laboratory quality assurance. Women positive for HPV16/18 were referred directly for colposcopic evaluation. Primary outcomes included screening uptake, kit return rate, HPV positivity and follow-up completion among HPV16/18-positive women. Secondary outcomes included turnaround times, HPV positivity by age and sampling setting, and participant feedback.

resultsBetween April and December 2025, 593 women were offered HPV self-sampling; only 4 (0.67%) declined participation. Of 589 distributed kits, 572 samples were returned and analysed (attendance rate 96.46%, 572/596), with non-return occurring only in refugee centres. Overall, 52/572 women (9.1%) tested positive for targeted HPV types, including 22 (3.8%) positive for HPV16/18 and 30 (5.2%) positive for HPV31/33/35/45/52/58. All women testing positive for HPV16/18 were contacted and referred for specialist follow-up; among those completing follow-up, all were assessed within 2 months. Median turnaround time from self-sampling to results was 6.3 days. All recorded participant feedback was positive.

conclusionHPV self-sampling-based cervical cancer screening can be initiated and maintained during active war with high uptake, timely laboratory processing and effective referral of women at highest risk. Simplified, low-contact screening pathways may support cervical cancer prevention under wartime conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07275333.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass ScreeningPapillomavirus InfectionsSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsWarfareAdultArmed ConflictsFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsUkraineCancerImplementation ScienceScreening

Identifiers

PMID42049387
PMCPMC13141220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.