ArticleBMJ global health2026
Quantifying multilateral contributions to surgical system development in low- and middle-income countries: an analysis of trends and opportunities.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFinancial limitations have stalled the implementation of national surgical plans in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which significantly rely on development assistance for their health expenditures. This paper describes the challenges and opportunities in accessing development assistance from multilateral organisations and quantifies the trends of their financial contributions to surgical systems in LMICs.
methodsWe analysed publicly available data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Financing Global Health database and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Creditor Reporting System. We analysed disbursements from multilateral organisations and reported values in the trends from 2014 to 2022, major contributing organisations, geographic variations and implementing partners.
resultsMultilateral organisations mobilised $232 billion in development assistance for health from 2014 to 2022, with the highest amount in 2021, during major global crises. Only 0.4% ($901.5 million) of this was disbursed to finance surgical care. Approximately 84% was financed from multilateral development banks, primarily by the World Bank Group and the Inter-American Development Bank. Disbursements went mainly to system-strengthening projects on building infrastructure and blood supply systems. Orthopaedic surgery was the highest, while anaesthesia and critical care were the least funded surgical specialties. Recipient governments were the major implementing partners.
conclusionDespite a noticeable growth following the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, surgical care remains underfunded at 0.4% of multilateral development assistance, compared with the 50% that goes to communicable diseases. This gap reflects the dominance of disease-specific global health initiatives in the multilateral financing landscape. Multilateral development banks are demonstrating increased capacity to address this shortfall in multilateral finance. They emerge as strategic partners to advance surgical systems strengthening in LMICs by offering flexible financing mechanisms and supporting recipient-led implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.