Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049302›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Controlled, before-and-after analysis and pre-post surveys to assess the effects of a community-wide sanitation system on environmental contamination, infection risk and well-being in Alabama's Black Belt: study protocol.

Olivia A Harmon, Megan E J Lott, David A Holcomb, Emily McGlohn, Mark Elliott, Kevin White, Joe Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivia A HarmonDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5953-8089
Megan E J LottDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
David A HolcombDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-7164
Emily McGlohnDepartment of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Mark ElliottDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
Kevin WhiteDepartment of Civil, Costal, and Environmental Engineering, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
Joe BrownDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA joebrown@unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5200-4148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRural sanitation deficits in the USA represent an important source of non-point source pollution and may present risks to public health. We propose a controlled, before-and-after (CBA) study using a difference-in-differences analysis to measure the effect of a town-wide sanitation expansion programme on the release of pathogens to the environment. This work is expected to yield valuable insight into the potential for rural sanitation improvements to reduce pathogen releases and support public health and well-being.

methodsWe will conduct a CBA study including quantitative measurement of key enteric pathogens and faecal indicator bacteria adjacent to 30 households lacking adequate sanitation. As households connect to a new sewerage system serving the entire community, longitudinal household sampling will continue until crossover is complete. We will include 10 concurrent control sites with existing appropriate sanitation as well as 10 control sites never receiving the intervention to monitor secular trends in pathogen releases during the study period. ANALYSIS: We will compare the concentration of culturable ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Informed consent will be obtained prior to data collection, with participants informed of study details and risks. Participation is completely voluntary, and identifiable data will be securely and separately stored from all other data. Each household will be offered a summary of their site-specific data. Deidentified results will be shared with the community in a public forum and published in peer-reviewed journals. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research (IRB) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (IRB #24-0665).

Indexed as

Environmental PollutionSanitationAlabamaEscherichia coliFecesHumansPublic HealthResearch DesignRural PopulationGastrointestinal infectionsMICROBIOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42049302
PMCPMC13141031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.