ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
VerteRo: A Fully Automated Deep Neural Network Tool for Estimating Axial Vertebral Body Rotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective validation study.ObjectivesTo develop and validate VerteRo, a fully automated deep learning-based tool that estimates axial vertebral body rotation (VBR) from standard posteroanterior (PA) scoliosis radiographs with high accuracy, overcoming the limitations of categorical grading systems.MethodsA multi-stage convolutional neural network pipeline incorporating automated region-of-interest (ROI) extraction, vertebral segmentation, pedicle localization, and geometric rotation estimation was trained on 97 AIS radiographs. Three object detection architectures (Faster R-CNN, YOLOv11 L, YOLOv12 L) were evaluated. The mean absolute error (MAE) relative to Stokes-derived reference angles was measured as the primary outcome and concordance with Nash-Moe grading was measured as the secondary outcome.ResultsFaster R-CNN demonstrated superior pedicle detection (F1 = 0.93) compared with YOLOv11 L and YOLOv12 L. VerteRo achieved a mean absolute error of 8.239° relative to reference standards. 71.34% of vertebrae demonstrated exact grade agreement with the Nash-Moe grading system.ConclusionsThis pilot study provides a proof-of-concept for a fully automated, end-to-end solution for quantitative axial rotation assessment from PA radiographs, offering improved objectivity over categorical grading methods. Its ability to generate quantitative axial rotation measures rather than coarse categorical grades has strong potential for supporting research applications and potential decision-support in clinical assessment following further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.