Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049202›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026

Sperm DNA fragmentation: how to test, when to test, and what to do with abnormal results-a pragmatic mini-review for clinical practice.

Sandro C Esteves, Peter Humaidan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandro C EstevesANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1313-9680
Peter HumaidanDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6884-5366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) represents strand breaks that may compromise embryo development, reproductive outcomes, and offspring health, particularly when the oocyte's repair capacity is limited. This mini-review provides a clinically pragmatic framework addressing how to test, when to test, and whom to test for SDF, translating biological and laboratory insights into actionable andrology practice. The mechanistic basis of SDF is summarized, including the two-step hypothesis linking defective chromatin packaging to oxidative stress, and the combined influence of paternal and maternal aging on the creation and repair of DNA lesions. Contemporary methods for detecting both single- and double-strand breaks (DSBs), as well as DSB-specific platforms, are reviewed with emphasis on assay-specific cut-offs and clinical indications. Management strategies are outlined, prioritizing andrological optimization through lifestyle modification, antioxidant supplementation, treatment of genital tract infection, varicocele repair, and selected hormonal therapy, followed by retesting after one spermatogenic cycle. For persistently high SDF, selective use of testicular sperm for ICSI (Testi-ICSI) and laboratory adjuncts is discussed, supported by evidence of lower miscarriage and higher live-birth rates in defined high-SDF phenotypes. The limitations of the existing observational evidence base-particularly the paucity of phenotype-targeted randomized controlled trials-are highlighted. The review also underscores the value of embedding SDF testing within quality-managed programs and incorporating systematic audits of indications, treatment effects, and ART outcomes. Beyond ART, SDF assessment is positioned within preconception care, recognizing sperm chromatin integrity as a determinant of reproductive and intergenerational health. Future priorities include randomized trials comparing testicular and ejaculated sperm for ICSI in high-SDF cohorts, validation of DSB-specific assays, and longitudinal offspring follow-up to clarify intergenerational effects. This integrative approach promotes precision rather than proliferation of testing, aligning molecular insight with clinical prudence to improve reproductive and generational outcomes.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationInfertility, MaleSpermatozoaFemaleHumansMaleOxidative StressSemen AnalysisSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmicassisted reproductive technologyDNA fragmentationinfertilitymalemicrofluidicsoxidative stresspaternal agesemen analysisspermatozoasperm retrievalvaricocele

Identifiers

PMID42049202
PMCPMC13334924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.