Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049009›Full record

ArticleRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia2026

Cost-effectiveness of Including p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining in the Detection of Cervical Lesions in Colombia, 2024

Andrés Álvarez, Simón Díaz, Rafael Alberto Niño, Yudely Asmith Medina, Andrea Chacón, Andrea Franco

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrés ÁlvarezViva 1A. Medellín, Colombia.
Simón DíazViva 1A. Medellín, Colombia.
Rafael Alberto NiñoInvalue Health Solutions S.A.S. Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-2358-0752
Yudely Asmith MedinaInvalue Health Solutions S.A.S. Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0007-3488-1570
Andrea ChacónInvalue Health Solutions S.A.S. Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrea FrancoInvalue Health Solutions S.A.S. Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of incorporating p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology into cervical cancer screening protocols compared to the standard diagnostic pathway in Colombia. Material and methods: A decision-tree model was developed from the healthcare provider perspective, using real-world data and scientific evidence. The primary outcome was the number of invasive procedures avoided. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to address uncertainty. Results: Incorporating p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology proved to be a dominant strategy, significantly reducing unnecessary colposcopies and biopsies and generating cost savings (–COP $80 million for women aged 25 to 29 and –COP $54 million for women aged 30 to 65). Sensitivity analyses confirmed model robustness. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness analysis suggests the advisability of incorporating the p16/Ki-67 dualstaining test into cervical cancer screening protocols, as it reduces unnecessary examinations and improves resource allocation. Studies are needed that evaluate the performance of screening tests in the local context and that incorporate morbidity and mortality outcomes to assess hard outcomes over a longer time horizon.

Indexed as

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Early Detection of CancerKi-67 AntigenUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBiopsyColombiaColposcopyCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDecision TreesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Ki-67 AntigenBiomarkersCost-benefit analysisCytologyPapillomavirus infectionsUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID42049009
PMCPMC13160584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.