ArticleRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia2026
Cost-effectiveness of Including p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining in the Detection of Cervical Lesions in Colombia, 2024
Article in Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of incorporating p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology into cervical cancer screening protocols compared to the standard diagnostic pathway in Colombia. Material and methods: A decision-tree model was developed from the healthcare provider perspective, using real-world data and scientific evidence. The primary outcome was the number of invasive procedures avoided. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to address uncertainty. Results: Incorporating p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology proved to be a dominant strategy, significantly reducing unnecessary colposcopies and biopsies and generating cost savings (–COP $80 million for women aged 25 to 29 and –COP $54 million for women aged 30 to 65). Sensitivity analyses confirmed model robustness. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness analysis suggests the advisability of incorporating the p16/Ki-67 dualstaining test into cervical cancer screening protocols, as it reduces unnecessary examinations and improves resource allocation. Studies are needed that evaluate the performance of screening tests in the local context and that incorporate morbidity and mortality outcomes to assess hard outcomes over a longer time horizon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.