ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2026
Signaling of salience and prediction errors by anterior insula neurons.
Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Major individual and regional variations in unit entrainment by oscillations of different frequencies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human fMRI studies suggest that the anterior insula (AIC) encodes salience and deviations from expectations. However, BOLD signals have insufficient resolution to determine how AIC cells encode these variables. To study this question, rats were presented with auditory stimuli that varied from rewarding to aversive, instilling expectations that were later confirmed or challenged. Most AIC neurons showed significant task-related activity, either in the form of motor correlates, responses to appetitive or noxious sounds, in anticipation of reward delivery, or a combination of these factors. There was extensive overlap between neurons excited by the noxious and appetitive stimuli. Yet, stimuli with the highest positive and negative valence excited more AIC neurons than stimuli with intermediate valence, consistent with the signaling of salience. Strikingly, the responses of AIC cells to stimuli that confirmed reward expectations decreased whereas responses to stimuli that challenged reward expectations increased, akin to an unsigned prediction error signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.