Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42048598›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026

Post-licensure safety of nirsevimab from the Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network.

Marina Viñeta Paramo, Marilou Kiely, Louis Valiquette, Matthew P Muller, Allison McGeer, Jennifer E Isenor, Manish Sadarangani, James D Kellner, Otto G Vanderkooi, Kimberly Marty and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marina Viñeta ParamoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1096-3831
Marilou KielyCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Louis ValiquetteDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Matthew P MullerDepartment of Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Allison McGeerDepartment of Microbiology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer E IsenorCollege of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University and Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Manish SadaranganiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
James D KellnerDepartment of Pediatrics and Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Otto G VanderkooiDepartment of Pediatrics and Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kimberly MartyVaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Pascal M LavoieDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-0362
Julie A BettingerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-4174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although clinical trials have shown that nirsevimab is safe, post-licensure safety data from routine clinical settings are lacking. This study describes parent-reported health events occurring within seven days of nirsevimab administration. Post-licensure, active, safety surveillance was conducted during the 2024-25 viral season in Canada, using parent-completed questionnaires distributed 8 days after immunization. Parents or caregivers of 1,559 children completed the survey. A third (454/1,559) of children had received nirsevimab co-administered with routine vaccines. Local injection-site reactions were reported in 140 children (9.0%), 79/454 (17.4%, [95%CI: 14.2-21.3]) when nirsevimab was co-administered and 61/1,105 (5.5% [95%CI: 4.3-7.1]) when nirsevimab was given alone. Injection-site reactions extending beyond the closest joint were uncommon (6/1,559, 0.4%). Health events that prevented daily activities or required healthcare consultation were reported in 38/1,105 (3.4%) cases with nirsevimab administered alone and 19/454 (4.2%) with nirsevimab co-administered. The most reported symptoms were rhinorrhea: 1.8%, cough: 1.7%, feeding/eating changes: 1.6%, fever: 1.6% and diarrhea or change in bowel habits: 1.5%. Rash occurred in 10 children (0.6%). No cases of anaphylaxis were reported. Overall, in this study nirsevimab was well tolerated, with low incidence of health events within seven days of immunization. Results after co-administration support the incorporation of nirsevimab into the routine vaccination schedule. Documenting parent-reported outcomes in post-licensure settings expands the safety data obtained from clinical trials and offers transparent, timely additional reassuring data to enhance parental confidence in RSV antibody interventions.

Indexed as

Product Surveillance, PostmarketingCanadaChildChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansInfantInjection Site ReactionMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationlong-acting monoclonal antibodyNirsevimabpreventionRSVsafetysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42048598
PMCPMC13128022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.