ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Post-licensure safety of nirsevimab from the Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although clinical trials have shown that nirsevimab is safe, post-licensure safety data from routine clinical settings are lacking. This study describes parent-reported health events occurring within seven days of nirsevimab administration. Post-licensure, active, safety surveillance was conducted during the 2024-25 viral season in Canada, using parent-completed questionnaires distributed 8 days after immunization. Parents or caregivers of 1,559 children completed the survey. A third (454/1,559) of children had received nirsevimab co-administered with routine vaccines. Local injection-site reactions were reported in 140 children (9.0%), 79/454 (17.4%, [95%CI: 14.2-21.3]) when nirsevimab was co-administered and 61/1,105 (5.5% [95%CI: 4.3-7.1]) when nirsevimab was given alone. Injection-site reactions extending beyond the closest joint were uncommon (6/1,559, 0.4%). Health events that prevented daily activities or required healthcare consultation were reported in 38/1,105 (3.4%) cases with nirsevimab administered alone and 19/454 (4.2%) with nirsevimab co-administered. The most reported symptoms were rhinorrhea: 1.8%, cough: 1.7%, feeding/eating changes: 1.6%, fever: 1.6% and diarrhea or change in bowel habits: 1.5%. Rash occurred in 10 children (0.6%). No cases of anaphylaxis were reported. Overall, in this study nirsevimab was well tolerated, with low incidence of health events within seven days of immunization. Results after co-administration support the incorporation of nirsevimab into the routine vaccination schedule. Documenting parent-reported outcomes in post-licensure settings expands the safety data obtained from clinical trials and offers transparent, timely additional reassuring data to enhance parental confidence in RSV antibody interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.