ArticlePloS one2026
Safety-oriented and explainable machine learning for KSI crash risk prediction: Evidence from the United Kingdom.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Road traffic crashes pose a serious public safety challenge, particularly due to fatal and serious injuries. Although machine learning (ML) has been widely used for crash severity prediction, many studies remain accuracy-oriented and insufficiently address class imbalance, decision thresholds, and probabilistic reliability. This study proposes a safety-oriented and explainable ML framework for predicting killed or seriously injured (KSI) crashes using nationwide United Kingdom traffic accident data from 2020-2024. Crash severity is reformulated as a binary classification task distinguishing slight injury crashes from KSI outcomes, aligning model objectives with road safety priorities. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model is developed with imbalance handling using SMOTE, safety-oriented decision threshold optimization, and probability calibration. Model performance is evaluated using ROC-AUC, precision-recall analysis, confusion matrices, the Brier score, and a utility-based evaluation metric, while interpretability is ensured through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results show that default threshold settings fail to adequately detect severe crashes. At an optimized threshold of 0.35, the model achieves a Recall(KSI) of 0.605 - representing a substantial 73% improvement compared to conventional configurations - while maintaining acceptable precision. In addition, probability calibration confirms reliable risk estimation (Brier score = 0.190), supporting risk-based interpretation. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the SMOTE-based model provides a more balanced and operationally effective trade-off than class-weighted learning. SHAP analysis identifies speed limit, road class, lighting conditions, and urban context as key variables associated with KSI risk. The findings highlight the importance of safety-oriented learning design and context-aware performance interpretation for effective, risk-based traffic safety management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.