ArticlePloS one2026
Companionship utilization and its associated factors during childbirth among mothers who delivered at public hospitals in Shashemene town, Southern Ethiopia: A mixed-method study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildbirth companionship has multiple benefits and is associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, childbirth companionship is an important component of respectful maternity care that is still underutilized in the clinical setting. Therefore, this study assessed factors associated with childbirth companionship utilization among mothers who delivered at a public hospital in Shashemene town, southern Ethiopia.
methodsA facility-based mixed methods study was performed among 411 mothers who delivered at Public Hospitals in Shashemene town from August 20 to September 20, 2021. We entered the collected data into Epidata version 3.1 and exported it to SPSS software version 23 for analysis. A binary logistic regression model was employed to assess the relationship between independent variables and childbirth companionship utilization. A p < 0.05, with an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were employed to declare the association. For an in-depth interview, the interview guide was utilized to collect data. We used Open Code software 4.03 for verbatim transcription, translation, and thematic analysis of the data.
resultsThe magnitude of childbirth companionship utilization was 14.4% (95% CI: 11.2-17.6). Having complications during pregnancy and labor [AOR = 3.25, (95% CI: 1.74, 6.05)], having a future desire to have companions [AOR = 4.02, (95% CI: 1.72: 1.66, 9.41)], primiparous [AOR = 2.54, (95% CI: 1.25, 5.28)], and good knowledge of companionship [AOR = 3.00, (95% CI: 1.53, 5.91)] were significantly associated with childbirth companionship utilization. Qualitative findings also revealed that healthcare providers' denial, overcrowding of the delivery room, and mothers' fear of exposing partner/family members to stress were barriers to utilizing childbirth companionship.
conclusionIn this study, the magnitude of childbirth companionship utilization was low and below the WHO recommendation. Therefore, the study highlights the significance of acting on the health system, client, and provider-side factors, which are important to improve the implementation of respectful maternity care components at the facility level. In addition, the integration of respectful maternity care counseling into routine prenatal care, regardless of mothers' pregnancy risk status, could enhance utilization. Moreover, addressing barriers to companionship utilization through healthcare provider training, developing clear facility-based guidelines, and improving health facilities' infrastructure is crucial to enhance childbirth companionship and improve maternal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.