ArticlePloS one2026
Syntactic language change in English and German: Metrics, parsers, and convergences.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Syntactic language change has gained increasing attention in recent years. Previous computational work based on dependency relations has focused on diachronic trends in dependency distance, which measures the linear distance between dependent words, using dependency trees automatically predicted by a dependency parser (mostly the Stanford CoreNLP parser). In this work, we introduce a set of 15 syntax metrics that extend the analysis beyond linear distance by incorporating both linear and tree graph properties of dependency trees, such as tree height and degree. Besides, we propose a multi-parser approach to reduce the impact of using specific parsers, thereby increasing the robustness of the detected language changes. Through a cross-lingual investigation of English and German in parliamentary debates from the last 160 years, using 6 different parsers (CoreNLP and five newer alternatives), we demonstrate that: (1) Relying on one single parser can be problematic, as the agreement on predicted trends can be low across parsers. (2) Our set of metrics can capture subtle patterns of syntactic changes. Our analysis shows that syntactic change over the time period inspected is largely similar between English and German, with only 2.2% of cases yielding opposite trends in these metrics. (3) We also show that changes in syntactic metrics seem to be more frequent at the tails of sentence length distributions and often move in opposite directions for short and long sentences. To our best knowledge, ours is the most comprehensive computational analysis of syntactic language change using modern NLP technology in recent corpora of English and German.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.