ArticlePloS one2026
Image quality improvement of liver ultrasound using unsupervised deep learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic liver disease (CLD) and subsequent liver cirrhosis (LC) are common causes of death and healthcare-related socio-economical costs worldwide. Ultrasound (US) is the first-line imaging modality for assessing the liver and associated hepatocellular carcinomas. Poor quality liver US images caused by aging or inadequate management of US equipment, can pose significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. From this perspective, the aim of this study was to enhance and assess the image quality of liver US obtained from an older, lower-performing device using a deep learning approach. A neural network based on a switchable cycle generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) was trained in an unsupervised learning setting, with low-quality images as inputs and high-quality images as targets. The study included consecutively acquired grey-scale liver US examinations from both a 12-year-old and a 4-year-old US device. Images from the older device served as inputs, while images from the newer device were used as targets for the deep learning-based algorithm. Image quality was evaluated by two experienced reviewers. The algorithm significantly improved the brightness, contrast, and overall quality of the reconstructed liver US images (p < 0.001), as assessed by both reviewers. However, no significant differences in image resolution and reverberation artifacts were noted by one of the reviewers. The weighted kappa values for image quality and diagnostic performance ranged from 0.225 to 0.838, indicating fair to almost-perfect inter-reader agreement. The proposed algorithm effectively enhances low-quality liver US images to high diagnostic quality, thereby potentially supporting clinical assessment and intervention in patients with LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.