ArticlePloS one2026
Ecological patterns in the Porto-Novo Lagoon (Benin, West Africa): A review with implications for SDG 6.3.2 and EU-WFD readiness toward ecological status classification.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban tropical lagoons provide vital services yet face nutrient loading, macrophyte blooms, and episodic hypoxia. This scoping review compiles four decades of hydromorphological, physico-chemical, and biotic evidence for Benin's Porto-Novo Lagoon and assesses readiness for UNEP SDG 6.3.2 Level 1 reporting and a EU Water Framework Directive (WFD)-oriented exploratory gap analysis rather than an operational assessment. The lagoon is strongly seasonal, shaped by Ouémé inflows and marine intrusions; eutrophication symptoms and floating macrophytes have intensified since the 1980s. Core SDG 6.3.2 Level 1 parameter-group proxies (pH, DO, EC, PO₄-P) are moderately covered, but nitrogen evidence is scarce and time-continuous station series are rare. A completeness audit indicates about 60% coverage for SDG-related variables and lower maturity for WFD biological elements, meaning that formal SDG compliance-based classification ("good and not good") and any Ecological Quality Ratios based WFD ecological status classification cannot be derived from the compiled literature. Near-term priorities are therefore framed as readiness building, focused on strengthening consistent in situ series for the SDG core groups; context-adapted complementary sources may support gap filling and interpretation but do not substitute Level 1 requirements. For WFD, the evidence base highlights prerequisites for future work, including transitional water-body delimitation and type-specific reference conditions, standardised Biological Quality Elements monitoring, and priority-substance surveillance. Comparison with Ébrié, Lekki, and Sakumo II underscores the value of governance and monitoring designs that avoid data fragmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.