ArticlePloS one2026
Behavioral mechanisms and learning outcomes of University Students' GAI-assisted learning in human-AI collaboration.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) technologies, their integration into higher education is becoming increasingly widespread. This transformation is not only reshaping students' learning approaches but also redefining the collaborative dynamics between humans and AI. Based on the triadic framework of Exploration-Exploitation-Adaptation, this empirical study (207 valid questionnaires from Chinese university students, analyzed via structural equation modeling) investigates the behavioral mechanisms and pathways influencing learning outcomes among university students engaged in GAI-assisted learning. It examines how role adaptation, self-efficacy, task-technology fit, and institutional support affect learners' exploration and exploitation behaviors, and how these behaviors in turn impact learning effect. The findings reveal that role adaptation and self-efficacy are the primary internal drivers of GAI-related learning behaviors, while institutional support and task-technology fit serve as essential external enablers. Both exploration and exploitation behaviors significantly enhance learning outcomes, with exploitation showing a more pronounced effect. The model demonstrates good fit and significant path relationships among variables. While the results are consistent with the proposed adaptation-exploration/exploitation-effectiveness pathway, they only reflect correlational evidence and do not establish a causal mechanism. Theoretically, this study enriches insights into human-AI collaboration in higher education. Practically, it offers guidance for the optimization of intelligent educational systems and the design of behavior-guided strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.