Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42048370›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Mapping programmes for mental health promotion in Singapore: A scoping review.

P V AshaRani, Xin Er Ong, Zakir Karuvetil, Christine S M Chen, Lim Ther, Lee Cheng, Mythily Subramaniam, Timothy Liu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P V AshaRaniResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8215-5214
Xin Er OngOffice of Population Health Operations, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Zakir KaruvetilNational Addictions Management Service, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Christine S M ChenOffice of Population Health Operations, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Lim TherNational University Health System, NUHS Tower Block, Singapore.
Lee ChengOffice of Population Health Operations, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Mythily SubramaniamResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Timothy LiuOperations, Office of Population Health Operations, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health disorders are on the rise globally, with policies promoting programmes that aim to enhance mental wellbeing across various population domains. This scoping review aims to examine the literature to identify and map the mental health programmes in Singapore, while identifying critical knowledge gaps and scope for future systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases including Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, OpenGrey and ProQuest, complemented by hand and bibliography searches. Articles published from 2000 onwards in English language were included. Independent parallel reviews were conducted by multiple reviewer pairs. Data was extracted into standardised, pre-piloted templates that incorporated the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. One hundred and six studies were included in the review, demonstrating diverse programmes targeting different age groups, with particular focus on older adults in hospital and community settings. The programmes addressed mental health outcomes in individuals with mental disorders, physical conditions, neurodevelopmental and learning disabilities, and among healthy individuals. Implemented by trained care teams or multidisciplinary professionals, these programmes generally showed positive outcomes. However, significant gaps were identified in the literature regarding user experiences, with minimal focus on implementation barriers and enablers. Notably, there was limited evidence of successful community-level implementation beyond the experimental phase, raising questions about programme sustainability and real-world effectiveness. Critical gaps were also identified in youth-specific suicide prevention programmes, despite suicide being a leading cause of death among youths, and programmes targeting the impact of built environment on mental health outcomes and workplace wellbeing. These areas represent important opportunities for future research and intervention development in Singapore's mental health landscape. Singapore has developed an active research network over the past decade to design and implement programmes aimed at improving mental health across different populations and settings. However, stronger collaborative approaches between academics and policymakers are needed to better utilise research findings and understand which programmes add value to the public health domain. Future research should focus on implementation science, long-term sustainability, and cost-effectiveness of these programmes in real-world settings.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesEvidence GapsHumansSingapore

Identifiers

PMID42048370
PMCPMC13124008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.