Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42048369›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2026

Clinical acuity and National Early Warning Scores (NEWS2) of remotely monitored patients on virtual wards: A retrospective cohort study.

Lauren J Scott, Rebecca Winterborn, Joanne Appleton, Chris Penfold, Jenny Tomkinson, Isobel Ward, Frank de Vocht, Alison Tavaré

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren J ScottNational Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-5123
Rebecca WinterbornNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Joanne AppletonNHS England South West, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Chris PenfoldNational Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jenny TomkinsonSirona Care & Health, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Isobel WardNational Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Frank de VochtNational Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alison TavaréNHS England South West, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual wards are an NHS priority, designed to deliver acute care, monitoring and treatment to people at home, providing an alternative to hospital admissions or facilitating earlier hospital discharge. The aim of this study was to understand the clinical acuity, care pathways and outcomes of people admitted to virtual wards in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire (BNSSG) who were remotely monitored.

methodsA retrospective observational cohort study of all remotely monitored patients aged 16 + years admitted to a virtual ward in BNSSG between October 2023-February 2025. Clinical observations (respiratory rate, oxygen saturations, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate and temperature) were collected, and National Early Warning Scores (NEWS2) were calculated. The area under the curve (AUC) of NEWS2 to predict hospital (re)admissions is presented.

results2,533 admissions across five care pathways were included: respiratory (41%), frailty (18%), outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (19%), heart failure (7%) and general (18%; pathways not mutually exclusive). Median virtual ward length of stay was 10 days (interquartile range 6-14). During the study period, 177 (7%) virtual ward admissions resulted in a hospital (re)admission and 9 (<1%) died. First NEWS2 = 0-2 in 1,651/2,479 (67%) admissions, NEWS2 = 3-4 in 569 (23%), NEWS2 = 5-6 in 204 (8%) and NEWS = 7+ in 55 (2%) admissions. Maximum NEWS2 was reasonably low during most admissions, with 800/2,479 (32%) NEWS2 = 0-2, 887 (36%) NEWS2 = 3-4, 568 (23%) NEWS2 = 5-6, and 224 (9%) NEWS2 = 7 +. The clinical acuity of most patients remained stable, with 964/2,331 (41%) deteriorating by 1-2 points and 696 (30%) not deteriorating at all. Both first NEWS2 and maximum NEWS2 had poor ability to predict hospital (re)admission (AUC 0.55 [95% CI 0.51-0.60] and 0.55 [95% CI 0.50-0.59], respectively).

conclusionMost remotely monitored patients had low clinical acuity on admission to virtual wards, however 10% had high clinical acuity with a NEWS2 value of at least 5. The distribution of NEWS2 on admission to virtual wards was very similar to the distribution of NEWS2 on admission to acute hospitals, as identified in the 2022 Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit. NEWS2 had poor predictive accuracy in this setting. However, hospital (re)admission rates were low (7%) so this should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Early Warning ScorePatient AcuityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRemote Patient MonitoringRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42048369
PMCPMC13123966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.