Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42048361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Mechanical analysis of skier activity in giant slalom.

Jurij Hladnik, Radovan Dražumerič, Igor Petrović, Ivan Bon, Mateja Očić, Vjekoslav Cigrovski, Boris Jerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jurij HladnikDepartment of Engineering Design and Transportation Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-6506
Radovan DražumeričDepartment for Management of Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Igor PetrovićLaboratory for aeronautics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5149-5611
Ivan BonDepartment of Kinesiology of Sports, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4046-3662
Mateja OčićLaboratory for Sports Games, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4723-4093
Vjekoslav CigrovskiDepartment of Kinesiology of Sports, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4519-4235
Boris JermanDepartment of Engineering Design and Transportation Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-3302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propulsive mechanical work in alpine skiing can be performed by gravity and by the skier's activity. In this study, the part of the work performed by the skier's activity for the movement of the skier's centre of mass (COM) relative to the skis (i.e., external skier activity mechanical work, [Formula: see text]) was analysed. The main objectives of the study were to determine (a) positive and negative [Formula: see text], (b) [Formula: see text] performed in the skiing direction ([Formula: see text]), and (c) mechanical work performed by individual external forces in giant slalom, including the corresponding power profiles. For this purpose, three-dimensional whole-body kinematics of five skilled skiers were measured with a global navigation satellite system and an inertial motion capture system, while skiing on a predefined giant slalom course. [Formula: see text] was calculated upon a two-point skier model as the difference between the work performed by the ground reaction force (GRF) at the COM and at the midpoint between the ankle joints. The negative [Formula: see text] was 3.1 times larger than the positive [Formula: see text], which answers an important question about the dominant muscle activity in alpine skiing. [Formula: see text] was exclusively positive on the expense of negative [Formula: see text] performed in other directions. [Formula: see text] and its power are a characteristic of ski turn mechanics and only partly reflect the skier's own propulsion. [Formula: see text] presented 2.4%, gravity 93.1% and GRF 4.5% of the total positive work in the skiing direction, respectively. Regarding energy dissipation, 81.0% of the total negative work was dissipated in the ski-snow contact, 14.6% against the air drag and 4.4% was absorbed in the skiers' bodies. Moreover, a new parameter for evaluation of skiing propulsion efficiency, considering also skier activity mechanical work, was defined.

Indexed as

SkiingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID42048361
PMCPMC13123946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.