ArticlePloS one2026
Developmental constraints in the repeated evolution of male tail characters in rhabditid and diplogastrid nematodes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A longstanding question in evolutionary biology is how change might be restricted or biased due to developmental constraints. To address this question, we investigated three recurrently evolving characters in rhabditid nematode male tails: tail tip morphogenesis, the number of genital papillae (GPs or "rays"), and phasmid position relative to the three most posterior GPs. This new analysis incorporates taxa (rhabditids Cruznema tripartitum, Haematozoon subulatum, Poikilolaimus oxycercus, diplogastrid Diplogasteroides nasuensis, and outgroup representative Brevibucca saprophaga) representing more and deeper divergence points in the rhabditid phylogeny than in previous analyses, allowing better resolution of ancestral states and changes. Analysis of GP characters was accomplished via immunofluorescent staining of adherens junctions at different stages of GP development and laser microbeam ablations of GP primordia. Findings include the following: (1) Loss and gain of tail tip morphogenesis occurred multiple times, possibly involving differences in fusion. (2) The pattern of GP anlagen in early L4 males is highly conserved and compatible with the previously proposed "archetype," but is established at different developmental times in different species, consistent with constraint on GP patterning by the cell lineage and anteroposterior and dorsoventral patterning systems. (3) The stem species of Rhabditina likely had 8 GPs, with the second GP (v2) gained after the divergence of Poikilolaimus; within rhabditids, a different GP (v6) appears to be lost twice independently. (4) Laser ablation showed that changes in phasmid position relative to GPs are not due to changes in cell lineage, but instead due to migratory switches in the relative positions of precursors of phasmid socket cells and GPs; these cell migrations occur at different developmental times in different species. In summary, our results indicate a strong constraint imposed on the cell lineage and dorsoventral positioning of GP precursors, with GP pattern diversity allowed by cell-specific migratory behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.