ArticlePloS one2026
Camera traps reveal extensive anthropogenic impacts inside protected areas in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Camera traps serve as an essential tool for monitoring the wildlife habitat while simultaneously detecting and assessing various anthropogenic intrusions within protected areas (PAs). This study aims to monitor anthropogenic intrusions within the PAs of Satchari National Park (SNP) of Sylhet in Bangladesh. The study was conducted from May 2024 to April 2025 using camera traps that were systematically installed in 19 different stations inside the SNP. The study detected a total of 8,042 counts of videos that provided a large number of various anthropogenic intrusions inside SNP. Importantly, the study significantly revealed several anthropogenic intrusions including hunting, poaching, wood collection, tourism, and livestock grazing inside SNP. Notably, our results demonstrated that hunters and poachers in SNP carried firearms and traditional tools, including bows and arrows, confirming active hunting practices and diverse hunting methods. Moreover, the temporal co-efficient analysis indicated that anthropogenic activities were associated with shifts in wildlife activity patterns and temporal dynamics. The current study indicates that such disturbances could potentially impact and disrupt the ecological balance and pose a threat to the long-term persistence of wildlife within PAs of SNP. The present study also suggests the importance of maintaining anthropogenic intrusions at minimal levels in SNP and strengthening eco-tourism management to reduce conflicts between wildlife conservation and human recreation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first camera trap monitoring to comprehensively evaluate anthropogenic activities in SNP of Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.