ArticleSexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation2026
Cytogenomic Investigation of Individuals with Ovotesticular Difference of Sex Development.
Article in Sexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOvotesticular difference of sex development (OT-DSD) may result from chimerism, mosaicism, structural, or sequence variants. However, even after investigating all known causes, many individuals still lack an established etiology. This study aimed to perform cytogenomic investigation of individuals with OT-DSD.
methodsThe sample consisted of 15 individuals with OT-DSD. Methods included G-banding karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), optical genome mapping (OGM), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS).
resultsG-banding karyotype revealed chimerism in two individuals, mosaicism in one, and 47,XXY karyotype in another. One individual had a pericentric inversion at the X chromosome, with breakpoints mapped close to SOX3. Ten individuals had a normal karyotype, eight 46,XX, and two 46,XY. CMA, performed in 11, identified a duplication including the SOX3 gene in one 46,XX individual, and two duplications in a 46,XY individual, with breakpoints mapped by WGS, suggesting a complex rearrangement that could affect VAMP7 expression. OGM was performed in two individuals and WGS in nine individuals, which did not reveal additional relevant structural variants (SVs).
conclusionCytogenomic methods identified causative alterations in 5/15 (33.3%) individuals, underscoring the need to combine complementary approaches to detect and characterize SVs. In the remaining cases, the etiology was undetermined, emphasizing the need for further molecular investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.