ArticleBlood purification2026
Integrating Algorithm-Driven Analytics and Clinical Decision Support in Remote Monitoring in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Patient and Clinician Experiences.
Article in Blood purification, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Remote Monitoring to Actionable Care: Real-World Implementation of an Interoperable Digital Ecosystem for Peritoneal Dialysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Remote Patient Monitoring in Home Dialysis Patients: Enhancing Care for Home Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.Seminars in dialysisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRemote monitoring programs for kidney failure patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD-RMP) are increasing worldwide and improving clinical outcomes. This study evaluated both patient-reported perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals when using the new Sharesource Analytics 1.0 APD-RMP platform and generated proposals for easily implemented decision rules.
methodsThis prospective observational study of 284 adult patients receiving APD-RMP and switching to the Sharesource Analytics 1.0 platform was conducted from March 1 to April 12, 2024, in six dialysis centers. Patient-reported experience was measured using the Kidney PREM survey, and healthcare usability was measured using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. Expert consensus and focus group techniques were used to create decision rules in response to data presented in the Sharesource Analytics 1.0 platform.
resultsPatients rated their overall experience with the service provided by their dialysis center at the end of the study period as 6.9 (SD 0.3), with seven being the best possible score. Nephrologists and nurses rated their satisfaction with the new tool at 6.8 (SD 0.3) and its usability at 6.8 (SD 0.3); the maximum possible score was 7. Twenty-seven healthcare professionals (20 women), including nephrologists and nurses, participated in the expert consensus and focus group, which - based on type of alarm, findings and causes, and review of possible actions - proposed decision rules for interventions.
conclusionCare delivered using a remote monitoring platform with analytics was associated with high patient-reported experience ratings and very good usability and satisfaction ratings from healthcare professionals. Integrating structured decision rules alongside remote analytics could facilitate a more proactive, personalized, and efficient APD-RMP care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.