Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42048259›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

A Formative Evaluation of Parental Perceptions Related to Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, and Reported Use of an e-Learning Resource Targeting Diet in the First 1000 Days: Survey Study.

Natalie Garzon Osorio, Frøydis Nordgård Vik, Elisabet Rudjord Hillesund, Sissel Heidi Helland, Penelope Love, Marianne Hope Abel, Harry Rutter, Andrew Keith Wills, Christine Helle, Tormod Bjørkkjær and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalie Garzon OsorioDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0009-0007-3064-3137
Frøydis Nordgård VikDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0001-7324-0070
Elisabet Rudjord HillesundDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0003-0757-1861
Sissel Heidi HellandDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-5524
Penelope LoveInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1244-3947
Marianne Hope AbelCentre for Evaluation of Public Health Measures, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6519-2064
Harry RutterDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0002-9322-0656
Andrew Keith WillsDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0002-9751-4707
Christine HelleDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0002-2113-9218
Tormod BjørkkjærDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0003-2337-055X
Nina Cecilie ØverbyDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0002-1871-041X
Anine Christine MedinDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, 4630, Norway, +4799570261.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-6264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In October 2022, the Nutrition Now (NN) e-learning resource was implemented within Maternal and Child Healthcare centers and Early Childhood Education and Care centers of a southern Norwegian municipality. The e-learning resource targets expectant parents, parents of children aged 0-2 years, and Early Childhood Education and Care staff, aiming to promote healthy dietary behaviors during the first 1000 days of life. Objective: This study aimed to explore parental perceptions related to the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and reported use of the NN e-learning resource among parents. Methods: From October 2022 to May 2023, expecting parents and parents of children aged 0-2 years were recruited from 2 Norwegian municipalities, one intervention group receiving access to the NN e-learning resource, and one control. Participants in the intervention group received a web-based follow-up questionnaire 7 months after gaining access to the NN e-learning resource. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 179 participants in the NN study intervention group, 48 completed the web-based follow-up questionnaire administered 7 months after enrollment. Parents rated the e-learning resource positively on items assessing whether they liked and appreciated the resource, perceived it as an appropriate source of information, and found it doable and easy to use. Most respondents reported visiting the resource (38/48, 79%), although only 21% (10/48) reported frequent visits. Less than half of the participants answering the web-based follow-up questionnaire reported having watched the theme films (20/48, 42%), the recipe films (17/48, 35%), or making food using recipes provided in the e-learning resource (20/48, 42%). Conclusions: Parents rated the NN e-learning resource positively but reported limited use. These findings point to the need for strategies that enhance engagement with self-guided digital interventions among expectant parents and parents of young children. Future efforts should focus on identifying how to maximize potential adoption of the e-learning resource and evaluate its impact to promote healthy dietary behaviors during the first 1000 days of life.

Indexed as

DietParentsPerceptionAdultChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNorwaySurveys and QuestionnairesAcceptability of Intervention MeasureAIMdiet interventiondigital healthdigital interventione-learning resourceFeasibility of Intervention MeasureFIMfirst 1000 daysIAMIntervention Appropriateness Measure

Identifiers

PMID42048259
PMCPMC13123635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.