ArticleSTAR protocols2026
Protocol to benchmark and evaluate the status of imbalance measure using correlation, data complexity, and ablation analyses.
Article in STAR protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning struggles with imbalanced data. Although several mitigation approaches exist, their application depends on the extent of imbalance. To determine the latter, a protocol was developed. Across 428 synthetic and 70 real datasets, 8 imbalance measures were benchmarked and evaluated using multiple classifiers, metrics, and correlation coefficients. The coding environment, data preparation, and correlation and complexity analyses are described. These are complemented by procedures for an ablation study of the most efficient measure: SIMBA (status of imbalance). For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Pivin-Bachler et al.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.