ArticleJCI insight2026
Steroid hormone antagonism affords vascular protection in a mouse model of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aortic dissection or rupture is a leading cause of mortality in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS), a disorder caused by mutations in the COL3A1 gene. Col3a1G938D/+ mice recapitulate features of VEDS, including high risk of aortic rupture. As in people with VEDS, aortic risk in this model accelerates at the onset of puberty, especially in males. We identify developmentally regulated gene programs associated with this vulnerability and that are targeted by treatments that mitigate aortic risk. Both genetic and pharmacological inhibition of the androgen receptor (AR) eliminated survival differences between sexes, while treatment with a dual AR and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist provided near-complete and durable protection in both sexes. Pathways targeted by dual AR/MR inhibition, including those related to extracellular matrix (ECM) organization and cell-ECM interactions, largely overlapped with those also modulated by isolated MR antagonism. Selective targeting of MR signaling emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy in both sexes that avoids sexual side effects in males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.