ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026
Evaluation of professional pharmacy activities under advanced practice agreements for inpatients at the McGill University Health Centre.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA limited number of jurisdictions worldwide authorize independent pharmacist prescribing. Legislative reforms in Quebec (Canada) now empower pharmacists to independently perform certain professional activities. Since 2021, Advanced Practice Agreements at the McGill University Health Centre have enhanced pharmacists' clinical autonomy, though the scope of each agreement varies across units. Limited evidence exists on how these agreements influence prescribing practices. This audit aimed to describe pharmacist-written prescriptions at the McGill University Health Centre, and examine inter-unit differences in prescribing trends.
methodsThis retrospective audit of three hospitals included 300 patients admitted in February, May, and October 2024 across five inpatient units. For each included patients, all prescriptions were reviewed. Descriptive metrics were developed and included total prescriptions, prescriptions per patient per day, proportion of patient days with pharmacist prescriptions, types of interventions, and medication classes.
resultsSeventy-nine percent of patients screened had at least one prescription written by a pharmacist. Pharmacists authored 32% of the 18 960 recorded prescriptions with 95% of these written independently. The proportion of pharmacist-written prescriptions varied across services. Most interventions involved prolongation or transfer orders, and initiation of new pharmacotherapies. Pharmacists actively prescribed high-risk medications, including anticoagulants, anticancer therapy, and hypoglycemic agents, highlighting their clinical expertise.
conclusionAdvanced Practice Agreements support pharmacists' autonomous prescribing and integration into patient care, with substantial involvement in complex therapies. Variation across units likely reflect differences in agreements' scope and timing of implementation, namely. Future research should evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led prescriptions on issues such as hospital readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.