Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42048124›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

ChASM: a statistically rigorous method for the detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in ancient DNA studies.

Adam B Rohrlach, Jonathan Tuke, Kay Prüfer, Wolfgang Haak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam B RohrlachDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4204-5018
Jonathan TukeSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Kay PrüferDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6242-3058
Wolfgang HaakDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 101141408-ROAMANCE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationHow individuals with conditions, disabilities or abnormalities were treated gives us valuable insights into past societies. Chromosomal aneuploidies, the presence of an abnormal number of copies of the chromosomes, represent the most common large-scale chromosomal abnormalities in human populations. Chromosomal aneuploidies can affect autosomal chromosomes (e.g. Down syndrome) as well as the sex chromosomes (e.g. Klinefelter syndrome), with physical manifestations ranging from mild to severe. While simple to identify genetically, chromosomal aneuploidies are difficult to diagnose from skeletal remains alone, as they present skeletal pathologies consistent with many other conditions.

resultsHere we present ChASM (Chromosomal Aneuploidy Screening Methodology), a statistically rigorous Bayesian method for detecting full autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies. The method leverages chromosome-wise read counts and takes into account differences in sequencing methodology, genetic coverage and condition rarity to produce posterior probability estimates for the screening of small and large databases of sequence data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: To facilitate the ease of use, ChASM has been implemented in R as the package RChASM. RChASM is available under MIT license on the Comprehensive R Archive Network.

Indexed as

AneuploidyDNA, AncientSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareBayes TheoremHumansDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID42048124
PMCPMC13198388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.