Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42048004›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Video-Based Analysis of Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Pancreatic Guidewire-Assisted Biliary Cannulation.

Kotaro Takeshita, Satoshi Asai, Kenji Matsuo, Takumi Sugihara, Kensei Kawasaki, Aoi Koizumi, Sayuri Hashimoto, Kaho Takagi, Yoshihiro Shima, Tomoya Hashimura and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kotaro TakeshitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan. k.takeshita@tane.or.jp.
Satoshi AsaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Kenji MatsuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Takumi SugiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Kensei KawasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Aoi KoizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Sayuri HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Kaho TakagiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Yoshihiro ShimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Tomoya HashimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Kento HisamatsuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Shuta OtachiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Yuki KanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Eisuke NakaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.
Eisuke AkamineDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujominami, Nishi-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka prefecture, 550-0025, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pancreatic guidewire (PGW) technique is widely used as a salvage method for difficult biliary cannulation; however, risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) in PGW cases remain unclear. Specifically, the role of detailed intraprocedural and morphological factors remains underexplored.

aimTo identify risk factors for PEP in PGW-assisted biliary cannulation using a retrospective video-based analysis.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ERCP with PGW-assisted biliary cannulation for naïve papillae at our institution between August 2017 and January 2023. Previously recorded endoscopic and fluoroscopic videos were analyzed to extract papillary morphology and intraprocedural variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with PEP.

resultsThe PGW technique was used in 215 of 862 ERCP procedures for naïve papillae; 178 cases with available video recordings were included in the analysis. The cannulation success rate was 96.1%, and PEP occurred in 20 patients (11.2%). In multivariable analysis, cannulation time ≥ 20 min (odds ratio [OR] 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-11.0) and short oral protrusion of the papilla (< 10 mm vs. ≥ 10 mm; OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.11-8.15) were independently associated with PEP. Guidewire insertion into a pancreatic side branch tended to increase PEP risk (OR 2.48, 95% CI 0.89-6.93).

conclusionIn PGW-assisted biliary cannulation, prolonged cannulation time, a short oral protrusion, and pancreatic side-branch guidewire insertion are important risk factors for PEP. These findings may help refine risk stratification and inform technical decision-making and prophylactic strategies in cases of difficult biliary cannulation.

Indexed as

CatheterizationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradePancreatitisAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVideo RecordingBiliary cannulationCannulation timeEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyPancreatic guidewirePost-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.