ArticleCJEM2026
Oral metoclopramide for pediatric migraine management in the ED: health records review.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMigraine is a common presentation in pediatric emergency departments (ED), and non-invasive treatment options are desirable. This study evaluated what proportion of children treated with oral metoclopramide would not need a rescue medication for the treatment of migraine in the ED.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary pediatric ED in Montréal, Canada, over a one-year period. Patients aged 8-18 years diagnosed with migraine and treated with either oral or intravenous metoclopramide were included. The primary outcome was headache relief, defined as no need for rescue medication. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay, adverse events, return visits within 7 days, and reduction in pain scores measured by the 10-point verbal numeric rating scale. The primary analysis was the proportion of children who did not need a rescue medication restricted to children treated with oral metoclopramide. Secondary exploratory analyses compared oral to intravenous administrations on primary and secondary outcomes.
resultsOf the 225 patients included, 78 received oral and 147 received intravenous metoclopramide. Headache relief was achieved in 83% (95% CI 73-91%) of the oral group. This compared favorably to the intravenous group (difference: 4%; 95% CI -7 to 14%). ED length of stay was shorter in the oral group (median 314 vs 500 min). Adverse events occurred only in the intravenous group (4%) and return visit proportions were similar between groups (difference 2%; 95% CI - 6 to 12%).
conclusionsOral metoclopramide is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for 80% of children with migraine in the ED. On exploratory evaluation, it offered comparable outcomes to intravenous administration with the added benefits of shorter ED stays and reduced procedural pain. Oral metoclopramide should be considered as a first-line treatment option for pediatric migraine in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42047987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.