ReviewNano-micro letters2026
Polarisation Engineering in Covalent Organic Frameworks for Catalysis.
Review in Nano-micro letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polarisation in covalent organic framework (COF) catalysts has emerged as an effective strategy to reduce strong excitonic binding and to improve charge transport through built-in electric fields. Unlike conventional inorganic ferroelectrics or polar materials, COFs enable programmable polarisation through molecular and lattice design, allowing internal fields to be tuned in strength and direction. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of polarisation in COFs, from its physical origins to its functional roles in catalysis. We first examine the multiscale origins of polarisation in COFs, encompassing bond-level electronic asymmetry, conjugation-mediated propagation, and framework-level structural organisation that governs dipole alignment and cancellation. We then summarise how polarisation is characterised experimentally and theoretically across different electronic and catalytic states, including ground-state electrostatic potential landscapes, photoexcited-state charge dynamics, and polarisation effects at solid-liquid catalytic interfaces. Finally, through representative photocatalytic and electrocatalytic case studies, we illustrate how deliberate polarisation engineering reshapes charge separation, transport, and reaction pathways across diverse catalytic reactions, and conclude by discussing the key opportunities and challenges for translating polarisation into a predictive design principle for COFs. By connecting the origins, characterisations, regulating strategies, and catalytic mechanisms, this review provides a more integrated perspective on polarisation phenomena in next-generation COF catalysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.