ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Immune interplay between sepsis and haematological malignancies.
Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Crosstalk between innate immune signaling pathways and integrated TLR, NLRP3 inflammasome, cGAS-STING, and NF-κB networks in sepsis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Haematological malignancies (HMs) are characterized by profound immune dysregulation, which increases susceptibility to sepsis. This dysregulation arises from the underlying disease and may be exacerbated by treatments. Sepsis itself induces a biphasic immune response, with an initial hyperinflammatory phase followed by prolonged immunosuppression that can persist for months or years, potentially impacting the course of HMs. This review examines the reciprocal interactions between HMs and sepsis, focusing on innate and adaptive immune alterations, the influence of malignancy-associated dysbiosis, and insights gained from experimental models. In addition, we discuss how sepsis-induced systemic inflammation may influence the progression of the underlying malignancy, through pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling and alterations in the bone marrow microenvironment. Understanding these complex interactions may provide a framework for mitigating infection-related complications and for exploring their influence on the natural history and progression of HM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.