ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
Hypnotizability and Time Reproduction.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypnotizability is a psychophysiological trait associated with structural variation in brain regions implicated in time perception, such as the cerebellum and the insula. This study investigated time reproduction across different interval durations in individuals with varying levels of hypnotizability. Forty healthy, right-handed participants of both sexes were assessed using the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form A and completed a time reproduction task consisting of visually presented intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 8 s (10 trials per duration). Relative proportional error (RE) and absolute proportional error (AE) were analyzed using mixed-effects models estimating the interaction between hypnotizability and interval duration through polynomial contrasts, with random intercepts and duration slopes for participants. Heart rate, sex, trait anxiety, and absorption were included as covariates. RE showed only a significant main effect of interval duration, with shorter intervals overestimated and longer intervals underestimated. AE showed a significant interaction between hypnotizability and the linear component of interval duration, indicating that higher hypnotizability was associated with a steeper decrease in AE as interval duration increased. The relatively lower precision at shorter intervals is consistent with attenuated sensory processing, whereas the relatively higher precision at longer intervals may reflect better functional coupling between executive and salience networks previously observed in highly hypnotizable individuals. The reduced precision at shorter intervals may be more consistent with cerebellar than insular involvement. Differences in time perception may be linked to reported associations between hypnotizability and an altered sense of agency and body ownership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.