ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Model-based rigid and nonrigid volumetric image registration for image-guided interventions.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate image registration is essential for aligning preoperative and intraoperative scans in image-guided neuro interventions, where even small misalignments can compromise navigation. This work introduces a model-based framework for rigid and nonrigid volumetric registration using shape-constrained deformable brain segmentation to establish anatomical point-based correspondence.
methodsUnlike traditional methods, the registration relies solely on anatomical geometry. Rigid registration aligns centroids and estimates transformations between segmented meshes. Nonrigid registration fits B-spline surfaces to corresponding mesh vertices, generating smooth deformation fields that capture local anatomical changes.
resultsQuantitative validation was performed using synthetically transformed MR scans. Additional structure-specific analysis confirmed accuracy across multiple brain regions. The rigid registration performed noninferiorly to an FDA-cleared approach, while the nonrigid registration effectively captured realistic deformations such as those resulting from brain shift. Both methods offer high accuracy and computational efficiency.
conclusionThe proposed model-based registration framework offers a robust, anatomically driven alternative to conventional image-based registration methods that eliminates reliance on image intensity. It results in improved registration accuracy and demonstrates strong clinical potential for integration into interventional workflows, with the promise of enhancing procedural precision, safety, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42047918What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.