ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Vestibular schwannoma microsurgery in the era of multimodal treatment: advances in technique and patient selection.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) has traditionally prioritized gross total resection to achieve high tumor control, often at the cost of cranial nerve injuries and quality of life impairment. However, advances in surgical approaches and intraoperative technologies, coupled with active surveillance and/or adjuvant treatment, have shifted the management paradigm towards prioritizing patient-centered outcomes, which are as critical as oncological control. CONTENT: The authors reviewed the technical advances driving this paradigm shift, including endoscopic assistance in the different microsurgical approaches (retrosigmoid, translabyrinthine, and middle cranial fossa approaches) of VS resection and advanced neuromonitoring (facial nerve electromyography and cochlear/auditory evoked potentials monitoring) and neuronavigation techniques. These innovations have improved rates of total resection and enhanced the safety of microsurgical resection in preserving cranial nerve function, particularly for large symptomatic tumors. We also highlight how tumor size, hearing status, preservation of facial nerve function, and quality of life considerations guide management decisions.
conclusionThe advancements in VS surgery management necessitate a balance between durable tumor control on the one hand and functional and quality of life preservation on the other. These nuances have placed microsurgery as the primary management modality for large tumors threatening neurological function, for definitive treatment in young patients where long-term control is paramount, for hearing preservation in small-medium sized tumors, for debilitating vestibular symptoms with large tumors, and for salvage therapy after radiosurgery failure. These advancements should be incorporated in the surgical armamentarium of skull base surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.