Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047902›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2026

Trends in breast reconstruction for BRCA1/2, PALB2 and other high penetrance germline pathogenic variant carriers undergoing risk reducing mastectomy.

Amel Melanson, Marya Alsuhaibani, Alex Viezel-Mathieu, Tassos Dionisopoulos, Mark Basik, Jean Francois Boileau, Karyne Martel, Ipshita Prakash, Sarkis Meterissian, Joshua Vorstenbosch and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amel MelansonDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marya AlsuhaibaniDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alex Viezel-MathieuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tassos DionisopoulosDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mark BasikDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean Francois BoileauDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Karyne MartelDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ipshita PrakashDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sarkis MeterissianDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joshua VorstenboschDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
William D FoulkesStroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Stephanie M WongDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. sm.wong@mcgill.ca.

Funding

Santé 309854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with germline pathogenic variants (GPV) in BRCA1/2, PALB2, or other high penetrance genes may consider risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) with or without reconstruction to reduce their risk of developing breast cancer. Few studies have characterized reconstructive trends in this patient population.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of female patients with a confirmed GPV in a high penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene who underwent RRM between 2003 and 2024. Clinicodemographic and surgical data were extracted from the electronic medical record. The Chi-squared test and Mantel-Haenszel test for trend were used to evaluate factors and temporal trends associated with reconstruction.

resultsOf 443 female GPV carriers who underwent RRM, 394 (88.9%) elected to undergo breast reconstruction. Factors significantly associated with reconstruction included younger age (p < 0.001), premenopausal status (p < 0.001), and more recent year of RRM (p = 0.04). In women undergoing reconstruction, the median age was 43 years (IQR 35–52) compared to 55 years (IQR 39–65) in those electing for no reconstruction (p < 0.001). There was a significant trend towards increased use of reconstruction over the study period (85.2% prior to 2012 vs. 97.0% after 2022, p < 0.01). In 375 carriers with reconstructive details available, implant-based reconstruction was the most common (94.1%), although autologous/flap based reconstructive procedures increased over time (2.3% of all reconstructive procedures prior to 2012 vs. 12.6% after 2022, p = 0.003). There was a trend towards decreasing use of tissue expanders over time (86.1% prior to 2012 vs. 26.3% after 2022), whereas direct-to-implant reconstruction (either single-staged or staged following reduction mastopexy) became the dominant reconstructive approach over the study period (11.6% prior to 2012 vs. 61.1% after 2022; p < 0.001). Among 353 patients undergoing implant-based techniques, the use of prepectoral implants increased dramatically over the study period (0% prior to 2012 to 94.0% after 2022, p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn BRCA1/2, PALB2, and other high penetrance GPV carriers undergoing RRM, the use of reconstruction increased from 85% prior to 2012 to 97% of all carriers in 2022. Implant-based techniques were the most commonly used, although autologous/flap-based reconstruction techniques gradual increased over time. Further research examining patient reported outcomes, recovery time, and the financial impact of different reconstructive approaches are warranted.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinMammaplastyProphylactic MastectomyAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedPenetranceBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinPALB2 protein, humanAutologous reconstructionBRCA1/2Breast reconstructionHereditary breast cancerImplant based reconstructionMastectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.