ArticleFamilial cancer2026
Five-year psychological impact and surveillance compliance in the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence of benefit for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surveillance is accumulating, including earlier staging, extended survival, and improved psychological function. This study aimed to assess the 5-year psychological impact of high-risk PDAC surveillance, performed at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Participants were offered annual endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with frequency increasing if clinically indicated. The impact of event scale (IES), comprising intrusion and avoidance subscales, and the psychological consequences questionnaire (PCQ), which assesses emotional, physical and social domains, were administered at baseline, 1-month, 1-year and 5-years post-baseline EUS. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to assess for differences in reported outcomes. Of the 143 participants under surveillance, 108 underwent annual investigations, and 35 had one or more episode(s) of intensified surveillance. Overall, screening compliance was high, though understandably, increased deferrals occurred during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Two participants were diagnosed with pancreatic neoplasms and half had pre-malignant pancreatic lesions that remained stable (n = 45) or showed progression (n = 28). There was a significant reduction in IES intrusion and an increase in positive PCQ emotional, physical and total scores at 5-years. Negative PCQ scores remained stable compared to baseline. There was no difference in IES, negative PCQ or positive PCQ scores based on EUS/MRI findings. Individuals undergoing intensified surveillance reported significantly lower positive PCQ physical and total scores, but there was no difference in negative PCQ or IES scores. These data provide reassurance regarding the acceptability and psychological safety of PDAC surveillance, despite frequent abnormal findings and intensified investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.