Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047892›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2026

Pancreatic multi structure segmentation on CT using transformer and deep learning approaches.

Chao An, Baisong Yang, Chen Zhang, Xinyan Mu, Yongxing Yun, Gendong Yang, Cheng Peng, Ziyu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chao AnGuangZhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Baisong YangDepartment of Emergency, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Chen ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xinyan MuDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yongxing YunDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Gendong YangDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Cheng PengDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Ziyu XuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Longgang District Central Hospital of Shenzhen, No. 6082 Longgang Avenue, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518116, China. xuziyuphd@gmail.com.

Funding

Shenzhen High-level Hospital Construction 001646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo comprehensively evaluate and compare the performance of six advanced deep learning architectures for automatic segmentation of pancreatic tumors and adjacent anatomical structures in contrast-enhanced CT images. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe multi-center study included 1968 CT scans that were acquired from 6 different medical institutions and thus covered a large range of imaging hardware and acquisition protocols. Six anatomical structures - pancreatic tumour, parenchyma, duct, common bile duct, venous system, and arterial system were manually segmented by experienced radiologists. Intensity normalization, spatial resampling and data augmentation were used as pre-processing steps. The evaluated architectures were U-Net, nnU-Net, ATTENTION-BASED RESIDUAL U-Net, DEEPLABV3+, SEGNET and SWIN-UNET. Each network was trained using a Dice loss together with cross-entropy and the Adam optimizer with a cosine learning rate scheduler. Internal and external validation was performed on an entirely independent external cohort (n = 536) using the following measures: Dice coefficient, Jaccard Index, Precision, Recall and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the two groups; Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used.

resultsSwin-Unet outperformed all other models in terms of volumetric and boundary metrics: Dice scores were obtained ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 and HD95 as low as 2.9 mm. nnU-Net achieved the second place and proved to be highly generalizable, although slightly lower accuracy was obtained for small/material tortuous structures. Transformer and attention-enhanced models significantly outperformed classical CNNs, especially in segmenting ducts and vascular anatomy. We demonstrated that the robust generalisation of Swin-Unet was validated externally with minimal degradation in performance when generalized to different institutions. Statistical results showed that Swin-Unet is significantly superior (p < 0.001) in all considered structures.

conclusionsAmong the six contemporary deep learning architectures compared in this large multi-center CT study with external validation, Swin-Unet achieved the highest segmentation accuracy and generalization, particularly for vascular structures and pancreatic parenchyma, while performance on thin and low-contrast ductal structures remains an area for further improvement.

Indexed as

CT segmentationDeep learningMulticenter imagingPancreatic cancerTransformer networks

Identifiers

PMID42047892
PMCPMC13260489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.