Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047861›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2026

When does consciousness arise? A subcortical model of its origins.

Saúl Sal-Sarria, Mark Solms, Oliver H Turnbull

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saúl Sal-SarriaLaboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. salsaul@uniovi.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4393-7277
Mark SolmsNeuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-3882
Oliver H TurnbullNorth Wales Medical School, Bangor University Wales, Bangor, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-4320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of consciousness constitutes one of the most enduring challenges in contemporary science, with implications for neuroscience, philosophy, medicine and ethics. Traditional accounts have emphasized the cerebral cortex as the seat of conscious awareness, largely due to its expansion and complexity in humans. However, converging evidence suggests that the foundations of consciousness lie not in higher cognition, but in more ancient subcortical systems responsible for affective experience. Central among these are the ascending arousal networks of the upper brainstem and the periaqueductal gray, which together sustain wakefulness and imbue it with valence. This reframing positions consciousness as an embodied biological function grounded in feeling, rather than as a component of higher cognition. From a developmental perspective, the relevant subcortical structures mature relatively early in gestation, raising the possibility that a primitive form of subjective feeling may emerge during the third trimester, well before cortical maturation. Such a view has far-reaching ethical consequences, informing debates on fetal pain perception, neonatal care, and the treatment of individuals with profound cognitive impairment. By synthesizing recent neuroscientific findings with developmental data, this paper argues for a subcortical basis of consciousness, and highlights the need for an integrative approach that situates the origins of consciousness within affective brainstem systems.

Indexed as

BrainBrain StemConsciousnessModels, NeurologicalAnimalsEmotionsHumansNeurodevelopmentPeriaqueductal GrayAffective neuroscienceBrainstemConsciousnessEmotionNeurodevelopmentPeriaqueductal gray

Identifiers

PMID42047861
PMCPMC13124862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.